Click the cross to close this cookie notice. X
Add a hyperlink to the space navigation. You can link to internal or external web pages. Enter the Tab name and Tab URL. Upload or choose an icon. Then click Save.
Important update: Do not reply to Monica Weah. Find out more.
If I gave you a few golf balls and a club at the driving range you’d probably like to just ‘hit a few.’ Unless your destined for the next PGA tour that’s quite reasonable, but lets assume you are receiving coaching from a qualified professional with the intention of making significant progress as a return on your investment for their fee …
How much information would you want to glean from this pro golfer about how to improve your game? Probably a lot!
But how do you want this information? All in one go, or in small, easy to manage chunks? Do you want a barrage of constant information before and after each strike of the ball or with time to practice in between?
What if I gave you a different piece of feedback each and every shot you took? All the feedback would be correct technical coaching points, but just something different each time? How would you feel about it?
Let’s consider a Yurchenko vault (gymnastics), a skill which has several stages to it:
Run up > hurdle > round off > board position > 1st flight to table > strike > repulsion/flight phase > landing.
There’s an awful lot of technique there to be thinking of. Like many skills, there is a domino effect when making changes to any one of these phases, it can have drastic impact on subsequent parts of the skill.
The logical thing to do is to tackle coaching the skill from start to finish. By refining the earlier stages of the skill as a priority, the learning process of the later phases will be easier. But in reality, this is hard to do. We can’t ignore the latter stages of the skill which are being performed poorly, as this will engrain undesired performance habits.
So we end up coaching all of it at once.
‘Lucy’ is performing her Yurchenko in training:
After Repetition 1 - This was the first rep and therefore the athlete is not fully warm, but the coach has provided feedback anyway to assist her next vault: ‘don’t step across in your round off.’Before Repetition 2 - The athlete is thinking about ‘not stepping across in the round off’ and performs the skill again, this time alternative feedback is provided: ‘your hurdle was too low, keep your chest up.’Before Repetition 3 - The athlete is thinking about the ‘hurdle’ as that was the last bit of information she remembers. But prior to performing Rep 3, the coach has also provided a different cue: ‘run faster.’
Let’s STOP for a moment.
Can you recognise the 'feedback frenzy' which is occurring? Within 3 repetitions there are several coaching points. They are all relevant, yet different. If the athlete is attempting to improve the points one at a time, and we are aware that it is unlikely they can concentrate on all of these points at once, then the athlete is in fact learning through repetition within certain conditions, and not necessarily the feedback itself.
Further more, this is assuming that the feedback being provided is CORRECT. Often, feedback is not technically accurate, and the athletes are still able to improve their performance over time.
This is the power of practice within certain conditions.
The conditions are that:a) the athlete is focusedb) the coach has a high expectation of the standard of performancec) the drill/exercise is a logical progression being used to help the skill acquisition process.
In these conditions both coach and athlete have a desire for progress, and the athlete is able to self regulate their performance through repetition and trial and error.
This differs from low performance conditions, where there is little emphasis of any technique, a patient step by step progression or attention to detail/desire to improve.
I have a few ‘guidelines’ that I Iike to follow when providing information to athletes:
How many times have you watched a movie, for you to watch it again a few months later andonly then understand the plot?
Or pick a book you have read in the past. How much of the book can you remember? From a 200 page book I would be surprised if you could even write down a couple of sides of A4 of what happened. Only so much information can be retained over time...
Make your information ‘sticky’ and obvious. Don’t speak unless it improves on silence.
Until next time...
If you enjoyed this you can find all my other ConnectedCoaches blogs here.
This blog is also available as a podcast on a number of platforms including iTunes. Listen here.
Whether sitting back quietly, patiently gathering information or actively getting involved in discussion, how can sharing others' experiences and ideas lead us to a b...
Let’s cut straight to the chase ... ‘Why?’ is one of the most powerful words in the human language. The question ‘why?' can provide you with answers to questions you ...
When Rob Maaye started a new thread asking what we might say to our younger selves at the beginning of our coaching journey, I had so much to tell myself, it's turned...
When we use feedback, are we thinking closely enough about whether it is the best way to achieve what we want to achieve?
We all coach differently, have different styles and different philosophies. But, what is presented in this post isn't a philosophy, its science.
Read about the most useless bit of feedback I have given to an athlete recently ...
UK Coaching is the brand name of registered UK Charity The National Coaching Foundation.
© Copyright The National Coaching Foundation, 2015, All rights reserved.
Registration Number 2092919 Charity Registration Number 327354
Registered Offices at: Chelsea Close, Off Amberley Road, Armley, Leeds, LS12 4HP
Homepage images ) Alan Edwards and Coachwise/SWpix?